| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| In affected versions of Octopus Server, insufficient integrity protection of authentication cookies, combined with incorrect validation of permissions assigned to a user that allowed them to view users or audit events, could result in the user escalating their privileges to those of an Administrator. |
| In affected versions of Octopus Server, incorrect validation of the permissions assigned to a user that would allow them to create project triggers could result in the user being able to run runbooks or create deployments they were not authorised to perform. |
| In affected versions of Octopus Server, incorrect validation of changes a user made to their own LDAP identity allowed them to edit that identity even when an Administrator had disabled self-service identity editing. This could result in the user gaining membership of teams mapped to external LDAP groups they do not belong to, and potentially escalating to full administrative privileges if any of those teams are privileged. |
| In affected versions of Octopus Server, incorrect validation of the external identity linked to a newly registered user could result in that user receiving the LDAP-mapped team memberships and associated permissions of another user. This issue only affects instances with LDAP authentication enabled and LDAP groups mapped to Octopus teams. |
| In affected versions of Octopus Server, insufficient validation of custom claims on OIDC accounts allowed a user with permission to edit accounts to cause Octopus Server to issue signed OIDC tokens that impersonate a different project. This could grant access to external systems, such as cloud providers or other Octopus instances, that trust that project's identity. |
| In affected versions of Octopus Server, incorrect validation of permissions assigned to a user that would allow them to edit their own login identities could result in that user being granted elevated permissions, up to and including system administrator access. This issue affects instances using LDAP authentication with self-service login editing enabled. |
| In affected versions of Octopus Server, users with certain scoped permission sets could execute arbitrary scripts on a worker (including the Octopus Server built-in worker). Incorrect permission validation during script execution would allow the script to execute without the user possessing the required authorisation. |
| In affected versions of Octopus Server with the LDAP authentication provider enabled, any authenticated user could call the LDAP user search and LDAP group search. |
| In affected versions of Octopus Server, a user holding the System Manager role could escalate their privileges to full system Administrator. |
| In affected versions of Octopus Server, creating a user invitation writes the invitation code to the audit event log. When the invitation is linked to a space, a user in that space with appropriate permissions could read the code from the audit event. Successfully exploiting this by redeeming the unclaimed invitation could allow the user to escalate privileges however this is dependant on the permissions assigned for the invited user. |
| In affected versions of Octopus Server, a user with permission to upload a malicious nuget package is able to deploy a script step so the script executes outside of the parent directory. |
| In affected versions of Octopus Server, OIDC token issuer validation was performed inconsistently. This could result in a token issued from a suitably configured non legitimate issuer being accepted as a token belonging to a service account from a legitimate trusted issuer. Exploitation requires a service account with at least one OIDC identity configured. An attacker would also need to know or guess some details of that identity in order to be in a position to attempt exploitation. |
| In affected versions of Octopus Server, an authenticated user with permission to modify roles could bypass the protections preventing access abuse resulting in privilege escalation. It was possible for the built-in role to be weakened and the attacker's account added to a privileged team. This was achievable due to improper validation of unsafe equivalence in inputs. |
| In affected versions, Octopus Server incorrectly evaluates multiple scoped permission assignments, allowing a highly privileged user to obtain deployment permissions beyond those actually granted to them. |
| In affected versions of Octopus Server, users with certain scoped permission sets could execute arbitrary scripts in an environment without possessing the required authorization. |
| In affected versions of Octopus Server, an authenticated user with permissions to edit an Environment or Project can set specifically crafted JSON content for the object. Insecure deserialization of this content allows the user to execute arbitrary code in the Octopus Server process. |
| In affected versions of Octopus Server, a user with permission to modify non built-in external feeds could exploit a path traversal flaw to overwrite arbitrary files on the server, which in some configurations could lead to remote code execution. |
| In affected versions of the Codefresh platform an authenticated user can utilize an API endpoint to elevate to Admin permissions. |
| In affected versions of Octopus Server under certain circumstances it is possible for sensitive variables to be printed in the deployment variable snapshot in clear-text. |
| In affected versions of Octopus Deploy Insufficient checks on the project trigger actions allows an unauthorized user to trigger a deployment. |
