| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Jeepay through 3.2.9 contains an insecure direct object reference vulnerability that allows authenticated merchant users to delete other merchants' division receivers by exploiting an ownership check on the wrong column. Attackers holding ENT_DIVISION_RECEIVER_DELETE who own a receiver group whose id matches a victim's receiver id can delete the victim's profit-sharing receiver. |
| PlayEdu through 2.3 contains a missing authorization vulnerability in the CourseController that allows authenticated students to access department-restricted courses by omitting the department visibility check. Attackers can enumerate sequential course and attachment IDs via the course details and attachment download endpoints to obtain course structure and attachment files from other departments. |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
nvme-multipath: set BLK_FEAT_ZONED only after the zone info is known
The namespace head is marked zoned at allocation time based only on the
command set identifier. If the zone info query reports a zero zone size,
the path namespace is registered without zoned limits while the head
still advertises the zoned capability with a zone size of zero, and
reporting zones or writing to the head then shifts by ilog2(0).
Drop the zoned feature from the head allocation and let the head limits
refresh stack it in from the path namespace instead. |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
tpm: fix off-by-four bounds check in tpm2_get_random()
When the response carries the TPM2_ST_SESSIONS tag, tpm2_get_random()
skips the 4-byte parameter size field before locating the random data,
but the bounds check still validates the response length against
TPM_HEADER_SIZE. A truncated response can pass the check and make
memcpy() read up to 4 bytes past the response end, so stale buffer
contents end up in the caller's random bytes.
Fix this by checking the response length against 'offset', which
already includes the skipped parameter size field. |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft XML allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network. |
| Improper access control in Windows Host Guardian Service allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. |
| Out-of-bounds read in Windows DWM Core Library allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Scripting Engine allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. |
| An arbitrary file deletion vulnerability exists in the command line interface of AOS-10 that could allow an authenticated attacker with administrative privileges to cause a denial of service. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to crash the system, preventing it from rebooting without manual intervention and disrupting normal operation of the affected device. |
| A stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the web-based management interface of AOS that could allow an authenticated remote attacker with high privileges to inject malicious scripts. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary script code in the context of another authenticated user's browser session. |
| An authentication bypass in the PAPI protocol of AOS-10 allows an unauthenticated adjacent attacker to circumvent existing authentication controls. Successful exploitation allows an attacker to change the state of certain settings of a vulnerable system. |
| An unauthenticated command injection vulnerability exists in the command line interface of AOS-10. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker with physical access to execute arbitrary commands as a privileged user on the underlying operating system leading to complete system compromise. |
| A buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the API of AOS-10 that could allow an authenticated adjacent attacker with high privileges to achieve remote code execution. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code as a privileged user on the underlying operating system. |
| An unauthenticated buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the command line interface of AOS-8. Successful exploitation could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to disrupt the availability of the affected interface, along with limited access to or modification of some system data. |
| An unauthenticated buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the underlying operating system of AOS-10 or AOS-8 and could allow an unauthenticated adjacent attacker to conduct a denial of service attack. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to disrupt the availability of the affected system, with a limited impact to the integrity of the affected component. |
| Command injection vulnerabilities exist in the affected interface of AOS-10 that could allow an authenticated remote attacker with high privileges to perform command injection. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary commands as a privileged user on the underlying operating system. |
| A vulnerability in the CLI command handling of the AOS-8 web interface could allow an authenticated remote attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the underlying operating system. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to run unauthorized commands on the system, potentially leading to system compromise. |
| An unauthenticated Denial-of-Service (DoS) vulnerability exists in the PAPI protocol of AOS-8. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability results in the ability to disrupt the availability of the affected interface. |
| Buffer overflow vulnerabilities exist in the affected interface of AOS-10 that could lead to unauthenticated remote code execution. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code as a privileged user on the underlying operating system, leading to complete system compromise. |
| Vulnerabilities in the affected interface of AOS-8 could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to bypass existing authentication controls and run arbitrary commands on the underlying host. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary commands as root on the underlying operating system leading to complete system compromise. |
